Home Comparison Arc A380 vs H3C XG310

Arc A380 vs H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2050MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380 +76%
4198
H3C XG310
2381

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
DG1
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net