Arc A380 vs T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2050MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+283%
4198
T400
1094
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
