ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs B200 SXM 192 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 1000W)
B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
16776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
B200 SXM 192 GB
+43011%
62080
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
120
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GB100
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
104 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
10.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
