ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
CMP 170HX
+8670%
12630
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
120
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GA100
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A