ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)
CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
CMP 40HX
+5179%
7603
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU106
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
