ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
120 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV380
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
-
