ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs FirePro W4300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
FirePro W4300
+891%
1428
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
12
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
