ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs GeForce GTX 750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)
GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
GeForce GTX 750
+671%
1111
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1111 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GM107
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GM107-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
