ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon 550X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Radeon 550X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1218MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
Radeon 550X
+765%
1247
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2019
Radeon R600
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1082 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1218 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
8
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.49 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1247 GFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1247 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Lexa
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
