ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon Pro 5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)
Radeon Pro 5700 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
Radeon Pro 5700
+4220%
6221
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
36
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.44 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.221 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
388.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XLA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
