ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon PRO W7500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
Radeon PRO W7500
+8365%
12190
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
28
120
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
64
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Navi 33
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
