ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs Radeon Pro WX 8100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 230W)
Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
Radeon Pro WX 8100
+7365%
10750
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2017
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
56
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
