ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
T1000
+1636%
2500
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
