ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 800W)
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
TITAN Ada
+64413%
92900
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
120
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
AD102
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
