ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO vs TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
144
TITAN X Pascal
+7518%
10970
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GP102
RV630 PRO
(215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
