Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

Centaur CHA vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

VS
EPYC Embedded 8224P
VIA Centaur CHA
AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P
We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and EPYC Embedded 8224P with 24 cores 2.55GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)
EPYC Embedded 8224P 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Sep 2023
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Siena
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

-
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
160 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
195 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
8
Total Core Count
24
8
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
44
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy