Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro 4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+526%
3994
Quadro 4000M
638
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
7
1024
Shading Units
336
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
