Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro 5010M

Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +478%
3994
Quadro 5010M
691

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF110
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net