Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+2396%
3994
Quadro FX 3600M
160
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
64
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
