Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1533%
16790
Quadro 6000
1028
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
204W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
