Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro FX 380M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+35623%
16790
Quadro FX 380M
47
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
32
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
