Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro FX 4600 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 154W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+7200%
16790
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
230
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
24
32
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
154W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
