Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 166% (2050MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+608%
16790
Quadro K5100M
2369
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
