Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (2050MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1845%
16790
Quadro K620M
863
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM108
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
