Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro P600

Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2050MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1303%
16790
Quadro P600
1196

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net