Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Tesla K20Xm

Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +326%
16790
Tesla K20Xm
3935

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

4096
Shading Units
2688
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
48
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net