Home Comparison EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3

EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3

We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 with 4 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v3 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (140W vs 180W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2023
Release Date
Sep 2014
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Haswell-EP
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 2011-3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)

Package

35.5 billions
Transistor Count
2.6 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
140 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
356 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
35.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 K per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
10 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
6
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
40

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy