EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon E 2186G
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon E 2186G with 6 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Xeon E 2186G 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+2%
1664
Xeon E 2186G
1621
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+97%
13349
Xeon E 2186G
6756
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
May 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Coffee Lake-S WS
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 1151
N/A
Integrated Graphics
HD Graphics P630
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
95 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
6
64
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
38.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
12 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
16
