EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon E 2468
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon E 2468 with 8 cores 2.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.6GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Xeon E 2468 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Xeon E 2468
+59%
2659
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+6%
13349
Xeon E 2468
12548
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Dec 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-S
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon E (Raptor Lake)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
65 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
257 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
26.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
16
