EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon W 1290E
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon W 1290E with 10 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 20MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Xeon W 1290E 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Xeon W 1290E
1669
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+44%
13349
Xeon W 1290E
9246
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
May 2020
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Comet Lake
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 1200
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics P630
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon (Comet Lake)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
95 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
206 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
32
Total Core Count
10
64
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
35.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
20 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2933
6
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
16
