Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs CMP 170HX 8 GB

FireGL V8650 vs CMP 170HX 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
CMP 170HX 8 GB +2770%
12630

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
320
Shading Units
4480
16
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA100
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net