Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GT 620

FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GT 620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650 +63%
440
GeForce GT 620
269

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2012
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GF108
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF108-100-KB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net