FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+100%
2432
Radeon R7 250X
1216
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
10
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
