FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 285
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
Radeon R9 285
+35%
3290
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
28
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO
(215-0851128)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
