Home Comparison FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 290X2

FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 580W)
Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
Radeon R9 290X2 +131%
5632

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
580W
450 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Hawaii
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net