Home Comparison FirePro S7000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

FirePro S7000 vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
22784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server +5080%
126000

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2025
FirePro
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR7
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
188
1280
Shading Units
24064
80
TMUs
752
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
502.5 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1968 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
126.0 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
126.0 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.968 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GB202
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net