Home Comparison FirePro S7000 vs TITAN RTX

FirePro S7000 vs TITAN RTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 280W)
TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
TITAN RTX +570%
16310

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Dec 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
1280
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
280W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU102
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net