Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

FireStream 9250 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250 +1823%
1000
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
52

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
2
800
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.600 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.00 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV610
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
RV610 PRO (215LKCAKA14FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net