FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 7950 GT AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 7950 GT AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
GeForce 7950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2007
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 7 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G71
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
G71-GT2-H-N-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
3.0