Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250 +2464%
1000
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
39

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2007
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
800
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT218
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net