Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 +337%
4375

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2018
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GP106
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP106-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net