FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 20GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 350W)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
9440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
+3310%
34100
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1335 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
800
Shading Units
10240
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
186.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
350W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA102-225-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6