FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 3090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 350W)
GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
9696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 3090
+3458%
35580
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1219 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
936.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
82
800
Shading Units
10496
40
TMUs
328
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
328
-
RT Cores
82
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.58 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.58 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
350W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6