FireStream 9250 vs GeForce RTX 5050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 5050 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
GeForce RTX 5050
+1190%
12900
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.90 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GB207
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GB207-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
10.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
