FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+420%
1000
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
192
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
3
800
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV630
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
