FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro V620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro V620
+1928%
20280
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
72
800
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT
(215-121000177)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
