FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro W5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 205W)
Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro W5700
+766%
8663
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
36
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
