FireStream 9250 vs Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon PRO W6300
+213%
3133
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
