FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro W6600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro W6600
+824%
9247
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
28
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 23
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
