FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro W6800X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon Pro W6800X
+1503%
16030
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
60
800
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
